Accumulating Research: A Systematic Account of How Cumulative Meta-Analyses Would Have Provided Knowledge, Improved Health, Reduced Harm and Saved Resources

Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

PLOS: July 28, 2014

Abstract

Background

“Cumulative meta-analysis” describes a statistical procedure to calculate, retrospectively, summary estimates from the results of similar trials every time the results of a further trial in the series had become available. In the early 1990s, comparisons of cumulative meta-analyses of treatments for myocardial infarction with advice promulgated through medical textbooks showed that research had continued long after robust estimates of treatment effects had accumulated, and that medical textbooks had overlooked strong, existing evidence from trials. Cumulative meta-analyses have subsequently been used to assess what could have been known had new studies been informed by systematic reviews of relevant existing evidence and how waste might have been reduced. Read More

Share the Clinical Trial Engagement Network
 

 

National Minority Quality Forum
1201 15th Street, NW
Suite 340
Washington, DC 20005

 

Tel: 202.223.7560
Fax: 202.223.7567
www.nmqf.org

Terms of Use     l    Privacy Policy